These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Electrophysiologic profile and efficacy of intravenous dofetilide (UK-68,798), a new class III antiarrhythmic drug, in patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Dofetilide Arrhythmia Study Group.
    Author: Bashir Y, Thomsen PE, Kingma JH, Møller M, Wong C, Cobbe SM, Jordaens L, Campbell RW, Rasmussen HS, Camm AJ.
    Journal: Am J Cardiol; 1995 Nov 15; 76(14):1040-4. PubMed ID: 7484858.
    Abstract:
    There is increasing evidence that class III antiarrhythmic agents may be superior to class I agents for the long-term treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. This open study evaluated the acute electrophysiologic effects, antiarrhythmic efficacy, and safety of different doses of intravenous dofetilide, a new class III drug, in 50 patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia inducible by programmed electrical stimulation who had previously been unsuccessfully treated with 0 to 7 (median 3) other drugs. Intravenous dofetilide was administered over 60 minutes at the following dose levels: 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 9.0, and 15.0 micrograms/kg. Significant class III activity was apparent at doses of 3.0 to 15.0 micrograms/kg, as evidenced by dose-related prolongation of the QTc interval by 13.4% to 14.2%, ventricular effective refractory period by 7.9% to 20.6%, and ventricular functional refractory period by 7.3% to 25.0%. The corresponding mean +/- SD plasma dofetilide concentrations ranged from 1.45 +/- 0.52 to 6.48 +/- 1.31 ng/ml. There was no evidence of reverse use-dependence. At these electrophysiologically active dose levels, intravenous dofetilide suppressed (complete response) or slowed (partial response) inducible ventricular tachycardia in 17 of 41 patients (41%) compared with 0 of 9 patients receiving only 1.5 micrograms/kg. The response rate was fairly uniform among the groups receiving 3.0, 6.0, 9.0, and 15.0 micrograms/kg. Intravenous dofetilide was hemodynamically well tolerated. Torsades de pointes (which was self-limiting) developed in only 1 patient, who was allocated to receive 15.0 micrograms/kg. There were no other proarrhythmic episodes or serious adverse effects. Further evaluation of the therapeutic potential of dofetilide in the management of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias is justified.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]