These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Endoscopic esophageal manometry. Author: Kwo PY, Cameron AJ, Phillips SF. Journal: Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 Nov; 90(11):1985-8. PubMed ID: 7485006. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We performed through-the-scope-manometry of the esophagus on 12 patients referred for esophageal symptoms. METHODS: A 3-lumen polyvinyl tube was passed through the biopsy channel of a standard video-endoscope. All patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with through-the-scope-manometry as well as a conventional laboratory-based manometric study; the sequence of the procedures was randomized. RESULTS: Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 18 +/- 11 mm of mercury by both methods. In the lower esophagus, mean wave amplitude was 60 +/- 25 mm of mercury by through-the-scope manometry and 82 +/- 28 by laboratory testing. In the upper esophagus, mean wave amplitude was 50 +/- 26 mm of mercury by through-the-scope manometry and 63 +/- 20 by laboratory testing. Wave duration tended to be lower by through-the-scope manometry than by laboratory testing in the lower and upper esophagus. In nine patients with normal esophageal motility, 54% of swallows resulted in a peristaltic wave by the endoscopic study versus 100% for the laboratory test. CONCLUSION: Through-the-scope-manometry was able to accurately measure lower esophageal sphincter pressure compared with laboratory-based manometry. Peristaltic wave amplitude by through-the-scope manometry was reduced compared with laboratory-based manometry, most likely because of the use of dry swallows. Through-the-scope-manometry has promise as a screening test for esophageal motility disorders.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]