These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: The comparative effects of equimolar sevoflurane and isoflurane in isolated hearts.
    Author: Graf BM, Vicenzi MN, Bosnjak ZJ, Stowe DF.
    Journal: Anesth Analg; 1995 Nov; 81(5):1026-32. PubMed ID: 7486042.
    Abstract:
    The aim of this study was to compare the direct effects of equivalent molar concentrations of sevoflurane (SEVO) and isoflurane (ISO) on electrophysiology, mechanical function, metabolism, and perfusion in isolated hearts, independent of neuronal, humoral, or hemodynamic influences. Three equimolar concentrations of SEVO or ISO were administered randomly in each of 14 guinea pig hearts perfused by the Langendorff technique. Spontaneous heart rate (HR), atrioventricular (AV) conduction time, left ventricular pressure (LVP), and coronary flow (CF) were measured directly. To differentiate a direct vasodilatory effect from an indirect metabolic effect due to autoregulation of CF, arterial and coronary sinus oxygen tension were measured continuously to calculate oxygen delivery (Do2), myocardial oxygen consumption (MVo2), percent O2 extraction, and cardiac efficiency. Linear slope analysis (cardiac effect as a function of 0.1 mM anesthetic concentration) was used to compare anesthetic effects. Only AV time was increased more (P < 0.05) by ISO (+1.8 ms per 0.1 mM) than by SEVO (+1.1 ms per 0.1 mM). CF tended to be higher with ISO (+0.7 mL.g-1.min-1 per 0.1 mM) than SEVO (0.4 mL.g-1.min-1 per 0.1 mM) but this was not significant. HR (ISO, -1.4% per 0.1 mM; SEVO, -1.7% per 0.1 mM), LVP (ISO, -5.8% per 0.1 mM; SEVO, -5.1% per 0.1 mM), and percent O2 extraction (ISO, -6.1% per 0.1 mM; SEVO, -5.8% per 0.1 mM) were decreased similarly by both anesthetics and these effects were accompanied by proportional decreases in MVo2 (ISO, -34% +/- 4%, SEVO, -37% +/- 6%) at the highest concentrations (0.53 mM). Neither anesthetic altered cardiac efficiency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]