These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Intracytoplasmic versus subzonal spermatozoa injection. A comparison of 2 different methods of micro-assisted fertilization].
    Author: Imthurn B, Macas E, Rosselli M, Münch M, Keller PJ.
    Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Sep; 55(9):526-31. PubMed ID: 7498721.
    Abstract:
    In order to define the usefulness of subzonal sperm insertion (SUZI) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), we studied in a comparative trial 46 consecutive treatment cycles of microassisted fertilisation by SUZI and ICSI. By ICSI 9% of the oocytes in metaphase II were damaged in 26 treatment cycles, by SUZI, however, not one single egg in 20 cycles (p < 0.001). Fertilisation rate after ICSI (65%) was, particularly in cases with combined sperm defects as well, significantly higher than after SUZI (35%; p < 0.001). Additionally, after ICSI a higher transfer (100% vs. 75%; p < 0.05) and pregnancy rate could be obtained (38% vs. 10% per cycle; p < or = 0.05). At the moment, 3 healthy children are born (2 after SUZI, 1 after ICSI), 4 patients are in the 2nd and 3rd trimenon, respectively, the remaining 5 patients aborted. In conclusion, the ICSI technique yields better results than SUZI, especially in cases of very severe male subfertility.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]