These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Assessment of right ventricular function by magnetic resonance imaging of old myocardial infarction].
    Author: Fujiwara S, Motoki K, Oshika H, Tomobuchi Y, Ueno Y, Nishio I.
    Journal: J Cardiol; 1995 Oct; 26(4):203-11. PubMed ID: 7500262.
    Abstract:
    The usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for estimating right ventricular function and the influence of left ventricular dysfunction on the performance of the right ventricle were assessed in 43 patients with chronic myocardial infarction (MI) and 14 control subjects (N) using electrocardiography-gated MRI and cardiac catheterization. Patients with MI were divided into three groups according to the location of the coronary lesions; 22 patients with left coronary artery lesion (LCA group), 13 with right coronary artery lesion (RCA group), and 8 with both left and right coronary artery lesions (L+R group). The right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) were measured by Simpson's rule algorithm on transverse images of the right ventricle obtained at the end-systolic and end-diastolic phases. In 34 of the 43 patients, the same parameters of right ventricular function were calculated by the thermodilution method using a Swan-Ganz catheter with rapid response thermistor. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end-diastolic volume were determined from left ventriculography. The intraobserver reproducibility (11 cases, r = 0.97) and interobserver reproducibility (11 cases, r = 0.92) of RVEF measured by MRI were excellent. The RVEF and RVEDV determined from MRI were significantly correlated with those from the thermodilution method (RVEF: r = 0.56, RVEDV: r = 0.52). There was no difference in right ventricular end-diastolic volume index in any patient group. The RVEF was decreased in the L+R (41.0 +/- 4.5%, p < 0.01) and RCA (45.9 +/- 6.6%) groups, but there was no difference between the LCA (50.6 +/- 6.6%) and N (48.9 +/- 4.3%) groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]