These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [The spatial resolution of the digital storage phosphor system. The monitor and film compared].
    Author: Nessi R, Castellana L, Paruccini N, Blanc M, Uslenghi CM.
    Journal: Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7501837.
    Abstract:
    The physical characteristics of radiographic images, namely spatial resolution and contrast, have obvious effects upon diagnostic image usefulness. We investigated the spatial resolution of both radiographs and magnified digital obtained with a storage phosphor system, in comparison with a film-screen combination. This study was carried out on the conventional radiographs of a phantom grid 0.5 mm thick, with resolution ranging from 0.5 to 10 lp/mm. Each examination was compared at naked eye and with the electronic evaluation of a region of interest on both standard and magnified views or by digitization with a charge coupled detector (CCD) television camera followed by the computing of the modulation transfer function curve. Our results demonstrate a higher spatial resolution of direct magnification, on both digital and film-screen pictures (over 5 lp/mm). On the contrary, the electronic magnification on the monitor yields the same spatial resolution as non-magnified digital images (up to 4.3 lp/mm). By selecting appropriate regions of interest, we could demonstrate the compression of the non-magnified images on the monitor. The modulation transfer curves show that direct magnification yields higher spatial resolution than electronic magnification and non-magnified views. Viewing electronically magnified images on the monitor yields the same resolution as contact radiographs: the monitor offers the advantage of an easier study of the regions of interest.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]