These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Kinetic response of human marrow myeloid progenitor cells to in vivo treatment of patients with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is different from the response to treatment with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Author: Broxmeyer HE, Benninger L, Patel SR, Benjamin RS, Vadhan-Raj S. Journal: Exp Hematol; 1994 Jan; 22(1):100-2. PubMed ID: 7506671. Abstract: We previously demonstrated that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) induced sustained increases in cycling of myeloid progenitors in patients with sarcoma. However, decreased proliferation of these cells to a slow- or noncycling state, below pretreatment levels, occurred within 1 to 2 days and maintained for at least 1 week after discontinuation of GM-CSF. To assess possible biological differences in GM-CSF and granulocyte (G)-CSF in such kinetic effects, we evaluated cycling status of marrow progenitors before, during, and after administration of recombinant human G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously [s.c.]) to six patients with sarcoma for 8 days. On the last (8th) day of G-CSF treatment, cycling rates of colony-forming units-granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM), burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU-E), and multipotent colony-forming units (CFU-GEMM) were enhanced 1.5- to 1.9-fold, to values of 40 +/- 10% to 58 +/- 5%. In sharp contrast to patients receiving GM-CSF, however, progenitor cells from patients off G-CSF treatment for 2 to 4 days were still rapidly proliferating. These differences in proliferative kinetics may be of use for design of clinical trials to efficaciously utilize these growth factors.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]