These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Can we do better than surgery in the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy? Results after 10 years in endoscopic resection and adenomectomy in urination and sexual disorders].
    Author: Coeurdacier P, Staerman F, Corbel L, Cipolla B, Guille F, Lobel B.
    Journal: Prog Urol; 1993 Dec; 3(6):1016-23; discussion 1021-2. PubMed ID: 7508313.
    Abstract:
    Surgery is considered to be the reference treatment for obstructive benign prostatic hypertrophy (NPH). Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and suprapubic prostatectomy are the operations most frequently performed by urologists. However, little information is available concerning the long-term results of this surgery. In order to assess the long-term efficacy, we recalled 618 consecutive patients operated for benign prostatic hypertrophy between 1979 and 1982 (390 by TURP and 228 by suprapubic prostatectomy (SP). 167 patients were reviewed and investigated, 150 had died and 301 were lost to follow-up. Ten years after the operation, 85% of the patients reviewed had good or satisfactory micturition and 72% of them were satisfied, regardless of the technique used. In 80% of patients, no complementary procedure was required to ensure urinary comfort. However, the effects of this surgery on sexual function were considerable, as one half of patients reporting sexual intercourse before the operation reported a deterioration of sexual function after the operation. Lastly, long-term morbidity affected 10 to 41% of patients and 9 to 12% of them were reoperated. Although, overall, surgery gave excellent results at 10 years, 15% of patients did not derive any benefit from the procedure. It is therefore important, in the future, to more clearly define the indications for surgery and the place of noninvasive treatments. At the present time, young subjects wishing to preserve their sex life may benefit from noninvasive first-line treatments, provided their quality of life is sufficiently altered by the severity of the urinary symptoms.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]