These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of the antimutagenic potential of anthracene: in vitro and ex vivo studies.
    Author: Bu-Abbas A, Ioannides C, Walker R.
    Journal: Mutat Res; 1994 Aug 01; 309(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 7519726.
    Abstract:
    The present study was undertaken in order to evaluate the in vitro and ex vivo antimutagenicity of anthracene against the food-borne carcinogen IQ (2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline). Anthracene caused a marked, concentration-dependent decrease in the mutagenicity of IQ in the Ames test, whether hepatic S9 or isolated microsomes from Aroclor 1254-induced rats served as the activation systems. Anthracene gave rise to a concentration-dependent inhibition of the 0-deethylation of ethoxyresorufin, a diagnostic probe for CYP1A (cytochrome P450 family 1, subfamily A) activity, and of the metabolic activation of Glu-P-1 (2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3',2'-d]imidazole, a diagnostic probe for CYP1A2. When microsomal metabolism of IQ was terminated by menadione, incorporation of anthracene into the incubation mixture once again inhibited the mutagenicity of IQ. All the above observations indicate that anthracene owes its antimutagenic response against IQ to: (a) inhibition of its CYP1A-mediated activation and (b) direct interaction between anthracene and the reactive intermediate(s) of IQ leading to their inactivation. Treatment of rats with anthracene did not greatly influence the ability of hepatic preparations to bioactivate IQ to mutagens. Similarly, administration of anthracene 2 h before sacrifice to Aroclor 1254-pretreated rats, did not modulate the hepatic activation of IQ. These findings demonstrate that the in vitro mechanisms of the antimutagenicity of anthracene are not operative in vivo, and further illustrate the inadequacy of in vitro studies, conducted in isolation, in predicting such effects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]