These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Allergic-type adverse reactions to low osmolality contrast media in patients with a history of allergy or asthma.
    Author: Simon MR.
    Journal: Invest Radiol; 1995 May; 30(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 7558732.
    Abstract:
    RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The author evaluated the hypothesis that the incidence of allergic-type adverse events among atopic and asthmatic cardiac angiography patients would be lower in patients randomized to receive nonionic versus ionic lower osmolal contrast medium. METHODS: Enrollment criteria included a history of food allergy, asthma, atopic dermatitis or pollinosis but not prior contrast media-induced adverse events. One hundred forty-two patients enrolled were randomized to receive either the ionic agent ioxaglate or nonionic iopamidol. Patients and investigators were masked. Sixty-eight patients received iopamidol, and 74 received ioxaglate. Group means were compared using the unpaired Student's t test. Contingency tables were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Allergic-type adverse events (excluding flushing, warmth, and cardiac events) were recorded in 8 of 68 patients in the iopamidol group versus 19 of 74 in the ioxaglate group. Ioxaglate was more likely to be associated with a reaction than iopamidol (P < 0.05, chi-square test). Iopamidol was more likely to be associated with flushing when considered independently (38 of 68) than use ioxaglate (24 of 74)(P < 0.005, chi-square test). There was no difference in the incidence of cardiac events, or any combination of allergic-type adverse events, cardiac events, and flushing in patients who received iopamidol or ioxaglate. CONCLUSION: In this double-masked study, iopamidol caused fewer allergic-type adverse events (excluding flushing and cardiac events) but more flushing than ioxaglate in patients with a history of asthma or atopic disease. When cardiac events also were considered, there was no difference in the incidence of reactions after iopamidol and ioxaglate.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]