These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Differences in arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase activity between inflammatory disease-susceptible Lewis and -resistant Fischer rats.
    Author: Mastorakos G, Patchev VK, Chader GJ, Chrousos GP, Gaudet SJ.
    Journal: Neuroendocrinology; 1995 Jul; 62(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 7566441.
    Abstract:
    Lewis (LEW/N) and Fischer (F344/N) rats are histocompatible inbred strains characterized, respectively, by susceptibility and resistance to inflammatory disease. The susceptibility of LEW/N rats to inflammation has been associated with deficient corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), ACTH, and corticosterone responses to inflammatory stimuli, specifically attributed to a global impairment in hypothalamic CRH neuron function. In contrast to the LEW/N rats, F344/N rats demonstrate an intact hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Melatonin, a neurohormone initially isolated in the pineal gland, has been implicated with inhibition of the HPA axis. To investigate melatonin synthesis and secretion in LEW/N and F344/N rats, we examined the diurnal activity of pineal arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT1), the rate-limiting enzyme in melatonin biosynthesis, which demonstrates circadian rhythmicity, as well as the diurnal levels of serum melatonin, in both strains. Arylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT2), a related enzyme activity, thought not to be regulated in a circadian manner, was examined as a control of NAT1 activity. Pineal NAT1 activity peak was observed later and reached significantly higher levels in LEW/N than in F344/N rats. Serum melatonin levels reflected the circadian pattern of the NAT1 activity, without, however, showing any quantitative differences between the two strains. Time-course of pineal NAT1 activity response to beta-adrenergic stimulation was parallel in the two rat strains, whereas the magnitude of the response as greater in LEW/N than in F344/N rats. No circadian or major quantitative differences in NAT2 activity were found between the two strains. Size-exclusion HPLC chromatograms of NAT1 activity revealed similar patterns in both rat strains.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]