These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy-milled all-ceramic crowns. Author: Rinke S, Hüls A, Jahn L. Journal: Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 7575971. Abstract: In this comparative in vitro study, the marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy-milled In-Ceram crowns were examined. Anterior crowns with medians of 32.5 microns for the conventional technique and 38 microns for the copy-milled units had significantly smaller gaps than premolar crowns that had a median marginal gap of 45 microns for both techniques. There was a significant difference in fracture strength only for anterior crowns. The study indicates that copy-milled In-Ceram crown have clinically acceptable margins and fracture strength and reduce laboratory fabrication time.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]