These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Characteristics and experiences of American women electing for early removal of contraceptive implants.
    Author: Frank ML, Ditmore JR, Ilegbodu AE, Bateman L, Poindexter AN.
    Journal: Contraception; 1995 Sep; 52(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 7587187.
    Abstract:
    The study describes the experiences of 430 women who had Norplant(R) contraceptive implants removed prior to the five years of method effectiveness. Each subject was surveyed when the implants were inserted and again at the time of removal. Descriptive data are presented concerning perceptions of the method before insertion and after removal, reactions to the contraceptive and experiences associated with the removal procedure. Subjects' use of Norplant implants ranged from 14 days to 40 months, with a mean of 13.3 and median of 13 months. Over 95% reported changes in menstrual bleeding patterns and 95% experienced other non-bleeding related side effects. Non-bleeding side effects were the most frequently indicated reasons for removal, followed by bleeding changes. The mean removal time was 34 minutes with a median of 25 minutes. Over 48% reported experiencing significant pain during the removal procedure, and 27% stated that the pain was greater than expected. Despite electing for early removal of implants,the majority of women surveyed indicated satisfaction with all aspects of the method save its effect on their overall health. Although method-related side effects were intolerable for most subjects, their overall perception of the method was generally satisfactory. 430 women enrolled at the time of acceptance in a longitudinal study of Norplant acceptability elected to have their implants removed between May 13, 1991 and September 8, 1994 (within 40 months of insertion). 225 of these women were surveyed immediately after removal, and 205 were identified during the follow-up study. The study provided information sociodemographic characteristics of the women and on 1) contraceptive method used before and after Norplant; 2) concerns about Norplant which were expressed prior to insertion; 3) reasons indicated for having implants removed; 4) changes in bleeding patterns; 5) side effects unrelated to menstrual bleeding; 6) significant pain reported during each of six stages of the removal process; and 7) user satisfaction in terms of comfort, convenience, cost, health effect, insertion, removal, and medical care. Most of the women chose early removal because they were unable to tolerate the side effects, but 13% chose removal because of discomfort at the implantation site and 10% because they no longer desired contraception. Removal was related to a pregnancy in three women (not method failure), and five others were acting on their physicians' advice. 48% of the women reported significant pain during removal, which was a larger number than expected. Since the cost-effectiveness of Norplant depends upon longterm use, it will be helpful to identify women who might be better served by a shorter term contraceptive. Despite the desire for removal, more than 25% of the women stated that they would consider Norplant use again in the future. Because side effects caused most women to discontinue, it is important that patients be properly counseled on the disadvantages of a longterm method.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]