These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Dobutamine stress: effects on regional myocardial blood flow and wall motion.
    Author: Severi S, Underwood R, Mohiaddin RH, Boyd H, Paterni M, Camici PG.
    Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Nov 01; 26(5):1187-95. PubMed ID: 7594031.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: This investigation studied the relation between regional myocardial blood flow and left ventricular function during dobutamine stress in patients with coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: Dobutamine stress is becoming more frequently used as an alternative to dynamic exercise in patients with ischemic heart disease. METHODS: We studied 12 patients with coronary artery disease. Dobutamine was infused from 5 micrograms/kg body weight per min up to 40 micrograms/kg per min or until chest pain or other intolerable side effects. Regional myocardial blood flow was measured with positron emission tomography and oxygen-15-labeled water. Regional wall motion was assessed in three short-axis slices by magnetic resonance imaging. Each slice was subdivided into four regions: septal, anterior, lateral and inferior. A total of 140 regions were suitable for comparison. RESULTS: During stress, new wall motion abnormalities developed in 27 regions. Myocardial blood flow (mean +/- SD) increased in 113 regions that did not develop wall motion abnormalities (0.98 +/- 0.26 [baseline] vs. 1.98 +/- 0.87 [dobutamine] ml/min per g, p < 0.001), whereas it did not change significantly in regions with stress-induced wall motion abnormalities (1.00 +/- 0.28 [baseline] vs. 1.30 +/- 0.62 [dobutamine] ml/min per g, p = NS). An absolute decrease in myocardial blood flow below the value at rest was observed in seven segments that developed wall motion abnormalities during stress. CONCLUSIONS: The normal functional response to dobutamine stress is paralleled by an increase in coronary flow, whereas mechanical dysfunction is accompanied by a blunted increase, or even a paradoxic decrease, in regional coronary flow.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]