These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative analysis of power-line interference between two- or three-electrode biopotential amplifiers.
    Author: Wood DE, Ewins DJ, Balachandran W.
    Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput; 1995 Jan; 33(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 7616784.
    Abstract:
    Differential input amplifiers are commonly used in the measurement of biopotential signals. This is because of their ability to reject common-mode signals, for example power-line interference. Rejection is further enhanced by referencing the subject to the instrumentation system. One such referencing technique uses a third subject electrode connected either to circuit common or to ground. However, these techniques are rarely explained or quantified in the literature. Four recording configurations are examined, isolated and non-isolated amplifiers with two and with three electrodes, and existing models are extended. From a brief assessment of power-line interference sources, it is concluded that only displacement currents induced into the leads and the body need be considered. The effect of these on the four configurations is analysed using SPICE. Results show that interference from displacement currents induced into the leads and into the body is dependent upon the recording configuration used and is significantly lower in three-electrode than in two-electrode amplifiers. Isolation also reduces levels of interference. It is concluded that the choice of referencing may affect interference levels on the biopotential signal significantly. Experimental and further analytical work is planned to confirm this.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]