These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Differential effects by Mad and Max on transformation by cellular and viral oncoproteins.
    Author: Cerni C, Bousset K, Seelos C, Burkhardt H, Henriksson M, Lüscher B.
    Journal: Oncogene; 1995 Aug 03; 11(3):587-96. PubMed ID: 7630643.
    Abstract:
    c-Myc is an essential component of the regulatory mechanisms controlling cell growth. Max is the obligatory partner of c-Myc for all its biological functions analysed to date. Recently two Max interacting proteins, Mad and Mxi1, have been identified. It has been suggested that these two proteins modulate c-Myc function, in the simplest model by competing with c-Myc for the interaction with Max. We have analysed different aspects of Mad function in comparison to Max. Native Mad/Max heterodimers bound specifically to a c-Myc/Max consensus DNA binding site. Furthermore Mad inhibited efficiently c-Myc, mutant p53, adenovirus E1a, or human papilloma virus type 16 transformation of rat embryo cells in cooperation with activated Ha-Ras. Myc transformed clones showed an increased cell cycle time and a reduced immortalization frequency after cotransfection with either mad or max. In contrast to Mad, Max did not inhibit E1a/Ha-Ras cotransformation but repressed c-Myc/Ha-Ras transformation efficiently. Mad delta N, an N-terminal deletion mutant of Mad, was as efficient in repressing c-Myc/Ha-Ras cotransformation as full length Mad but showed little inhibitory activity when assayed on E1a/Ha-Ras. Unlike wt Mad, Mad delta N had little effect on cell growth. Our data suggest that Mad affects cell growth at least in part by a c-Myc independent mechanism.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]