These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: The oxygen uptake-power regression in cyclists and untrained men: implications for the accumulated oxygen deficit.
    Author: Green S, Dawson BT.
    Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1995; 70(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 7649147.
    Abstract:
    The regression of oxygen uptake (VO2) on power output and the O2 demand predicted for suprapeak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) exercise (power output = 432 W) were compared in ten male cyclists [C, mean VO2peak = 67.9 (SD 4.2) ml.kg-1.min-1] and nine active, yet untrained men [UT, mean VO2peak = 54.1 (SD 6.5) ml.kg-1.min-1]. The VO2-power regression was determined using a continuous incremental cycle test (CON4), performed twice, which comprised several 4-min exercise periods progressing in intensity from approximately 40%-85% VO2peak. Minute ventilation (VE), heart rate (HR), respiratory exchange ratio (R), blood lactate concentration ([la-]b) and rectal temperature (Tre) were measured at rest and during CON4. The slope of the VO2-power regression was greater (P < or = 0.05) in C [12.4 (SD 0.7) ml.min-1.W-1] compared to UT [11.7 (SD 0.4) ml.min-1.W-1]; as a result, the O2 demand (at 432 W) was also higher (P < or = 0.05) in C [5.97 (SD 0.23) l.min-1] than UT [5.70 (SD 0.15) l.min-1]. Exercise R and [la-]b were lower (P < or = 0.05) in C in comparison to UT at all power outputs, whereas VE and HR were relatively lower (P < or = 0.05) in C at power outputs approximating 180 W, 220 W and 270 W. Differences in fat metabolism estimated over the first three power outputs accounted for approximately 19% of the difference in VO2-power slopes between the groups and up to 46% of the difference in VO2 at a given intensity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]