These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Contraceptive implant use among inner city teens. Author: Glantz S, Schaff E, Campbell-Heider N, Glantz JC, Bartlett M. Journal: J Adolesc Health; 1995 May; 16(5):389-95. PubMed ID: 7662690. Abstract: PURPOSES: This study develops a clinical profile of urban teens who selected Norplant for contraception; determines which variables identify the subjects most likely to be compliant with the method; and determines the most common reasons for early termination of use. METHODS: Demographic and health history data and reasons for termination of use were collected prospectively for 122 inner city teens who received Norplant. Life table analysis and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure were used to investigate differences between Norplant retainers and terminators. RESULTS: The sample consisted of black and Hispanic teens between the ages of 13-19 years, the majority of whom had one or more children and were in school. One and two year retention rates were 71% and 62%. The highest removal rates occurred during the 3-6 month interval after insertion. A significant finding was that teens who have experienced induced abortion were more likely to retain Norplant. Common reasons for termination of use included general and social concerns, including pregnancy desire. CONCLUSIONS: Norplant retention rates for this teen sample were greater than the compliance rates reported for other conventional methods. Similar to noncompliance with oral contraceptives, discontinuance of the method was most likely to occur in the first 6 months of use. A history of induced abortion identifies those teens most likely to retain Norplant, suggesting that these teens might evaluate contraceptive risks and benefits differently than those with no abortion history. Pregnancy desire was a common reason for terminating Norplant use. This prospective study of 122 Black and Hispanic inner-city adolescent Norplant users recruited from a teen clinic in Rochester, New York, was the first to include a two-year follow-up period. The study period extended from June 1, 1991, to June 30, 1993. The mean age of Norplant acceptors was 17.4 years; 76% had a parity of at least one. Recorded was a one-year retention rate of 71% and a two-year rate of 62%. The greatest number of removals occurred in the first three months after insertion. There was no association between Norplant retention and age, weight, race, parity, or school status. The only significant predictor of Norplant continuation was a history of at least one induced abortion. The reasons most frequently cited by the 30 adolescents who discontinued Norplant were headache, fatigue, hair loss, nausea, weight changes, breast symptoms, and appetite changes. Menstruation irregularities were reported only by terminators in the 3-6 month use interval. Considering the high continuation rates recorded in this survey and the method's proven effectiveness, Norplant has the potential to widen substantially the birth interval between adolescent pregnancies.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]