These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefotaxime in the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalized patients. Author: Jauregui L, Minns P, Hageage G. Journal: J Chemother; 1995 Apr; 7(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7666123. Abstract: Fifty-three hospitalized patients suffering from lower respiratory tract infections were evaluated in a randomized, comparative trial studying the safety and efficacy of ampicillin/sulbactam (2 g ampicillin plus 1 g sulbactam intravenously every 6 h) versus cefotaxime (2 g intravenously every 6 h). Thirty-four of the 36 and 16 of the 17 patients treated with ampicillin/sulbactam and cefotaxime, respectively, were evaluable. Clinical and bacteriologic efficacy did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups (p = 0.828 and p = 0.648, respectively). Twenty-one (61.8%) of the ampicillin/sulbactam-treated patients were cured, eight (23.5%) improved and four (11.8%) were treatment failures. Nine (56.3%) of the cefotaxime treated patients were cured, four (25.0%) improved and two (12.5%) failed therapy. All primary pathogens were eradicated in 19 (55.9%) of the ampicillin/sulbactam group and were partially eradicated in seven (20.6%) patients. In the cefotaxime treatment group bacteriologic eradication occurred in 10 (62.5%) and partial eradication in two (12.5%) patients. Both study drugs were well tolerated, as the number of adverse reactions in each treatment group was small and similar between the two groups. Ampicillin/sulbactam appears to be as safe and effective as cefotaxime in the therapy of hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infections caused by beta-lactamase positive and beta-lactamase negative pathogens.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]