These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Design and rationale of a randomised comparison of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil vs fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in node-positive premenopausal women with operable breast cancer. A trial of the International Collaborative Cancer Group (ICCG).
    Author: Wils J, Coombes RC, Marty M, Bliss J, Woods E.
    Journal: Drugs; 1993; 45 Suppl 2():46-50; discussion 49-50. PubMed ID: 7693422.
    Abstract:
    In 1984, the International Collaborative Cancer Group (ICCG) started a randomised trial comparing adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 plus fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks for 6 cycles (CMF) vs fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (FEC), all given intravenously on day 1 for 8 cycles at 3-week intervals in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. However, a large French institution that joined the ICCG shortly after the trial was initiated utilised different schedules of both CMF and FEC. Because different dose intensities were also employed, particularly of FEC, both patient groups, the French and non-French, will be analysed separately. A total of 761 patients were randomised as of March 1992. Patients were well balanced for prognostic factors. The median follow-up is now 3.5 years. Preliminary data have previously been reported in abstract form. Final data will be presented pending further follow-up.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]