These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Comparison of [123I]beta-CIT and [123I]IPCIT as single-photon emission tomography radiotracers for the dopamine transporter in nonhuman primates. Author: Scanley BE, al-Tikriti MS, Gandelman MS, Laruelle M, Zea-Ponce Y, Baldwin RM, Zoghbi SS, Hoffer PB, Charney DS, Wang S. Journal: Eur J Nucl Med; 1995 Jan; 22(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 7698153. Abstract: Single-photon emission tomographic (SPET) imaging with the radiotracer [123I]2 beta-carbomethoxy-3 beta-(4-iodophenyl)tropane ([123I]beta-CIT) has been reported to be a useful in vivo measure of dopamine (DA) transporters. However, in addition to its high DA transporter affinity, beta-CIT also binds with high affinity to serotonin (5-HT) transporters. 2 beta-Carboisopropoxy-3 beta-(4-iodophenyl)tropane (IPCIT) has been demonstrated by in vitro studies to have higher selectivity for the DA transporter. We compared [123I]beta-CIT and [123I]IPCIT SPET imaging and plasma metabolite analyses in baboons to evaluate the potential advantages of [123I]IPCIT for quantitative in vivo measurements of DA transporter densities. Both tracers had low levels (2% of total plasma 123I activity) of lipophilic radiolabeled metabolites at 420 min. [123I]IPCIT had significantly higher binding to plasma proteins. The average percent free (nonprotein bound) [123I]beta-CIT and [123I]IPCIT were 52% +/- 7% and 14% +/- 6%, respectively. Region of interest uptake data were normalized by injected dose and body weight. Consistent with the high density of 5-HT transporters in the midbrain and the lower 5-HT transporter affinity of IPCIT, the normalized peak specific midbrain uptake of [123I]beta-CIT (1.7 +/- 0.5) was higher than that of [123I]IPCIT (0.4 +/- 0.2). Consistent with its greater lipophilicity, [123I]IPCIT had higher nonspecific uptake, such that normalized cerebellar uptake of [123I]IPCIT was about twice that of [123I]beta-CIT. The ratio of specific to nonspecific uptake in striatum was greater for [123I]beta-CIT compared to [123I]IPCIT; however, striatal binding potentials and distribution volumes were not significantly different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]