These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of methods for early detection of noise vulnerability of the inner ear. Amplitude reduction of otoacoustic emissions are most sensitive at submaximal noise impulse exposure].
    Author: Plinkert PK, Hemmert W, Zenner HP.
    Journal: HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7713771.
    Abstract:
    Noise-induced temporary impairment of cochlear function was measured with several audiometric tests in order to evaluate which method best predicts a vulnerable cochlea. We tested 10 normally-hearing and 13 subjects who were positive for temporary threshold shifts (TTS). The latter were selected from 194 soldiers who demonstrated a TTS higher than 15 dB after regular training with firearms. Acoustic distortion products (DPOAE), click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), upper limit of hearing (ULH) and pure-tone and high-frequency audiometry were used to evaluate possible increased vulnerability of the cochlea. Tests were conducted at lower sound intensities (white noise, 90 dB SPL, 5 min; impact noise, 100 or 106 dB SPLs, 10 impulses/s, 5 min). Seventy per cent of the TTS-positive soldiers studied exhibited significant reductions of TEOAE amplitudes, whereas a stable emission was observed in all control subjects. DPOAE alterations were seen in 38% of the soldiers tested. These results indicate that TEOAE is the most sensitive, objective method for detecting a positive disturbance in cochlear function. Although the upper limit of hearing was also a very sensitive method, variability of this psychoacoustic method depended on the help and experience of the subjects being tested.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]