These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Treatment of cleft palate associated with Robin sequence: appraisal of risk factors.
    Author: Lehman JA, Fishman JR, Neiman GS.
    Journal: Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1995 Jan; 32(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 7727484.
    Abstract:
    Mandibular hypoplasia, airway obstruction, and a typical wide U-shaped cleft palate comprise the Robin sequence. Although much has been written regarding the treatment of these patients in the neonatal period, the literature reveals little information regarding later care of the cleft palate in these patients. The purpose of this study is to examine patients with the Robin sequence and evaluate the risk of postsurgical problems and outcome related to the neonatal period. Thirty-six patients with the Robin sequence presenting from 1972 through 1990 were reviewed. A majority of patients had feeding and respiratory difficulties, to varying degrees, following birth. These problems were treated successfully by maneuvers ranging from positioning to two infants who eventually required tracheostomy. Thirty-four patients had palate repair. Age at repair averaged 16.2 months, and one third of patients had associated anomalies. Infants who experienced problems following palatoplasty were those who had histories of severe difficulties and complications in the early months of life. In addition, patients with associated congenital anomalies has significantly more problems at the time of palate repair than those without anomalies. Those patients with the Robin sequence, who historically had minimal difficulty following birth, experienced few complications at the time of palate repair. Of the 34 patients with repaired palates, 23 demonstrated sufficient follow-up to allow for evaluation of speech outcome. Satisfactory or normal speech production was noted in 65.4%. This is not significantly different from that observed in all patients undergoing cleft palate repair during this same time period (74.9%). Secondary pharyngoplasty procedures were required in 17.4%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]