These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material.
    Author: Bergers E, van Diest PJ, Baak JP.
    Journal: Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jan; 8(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7734408.
    Abstract:
    DNA-variables such as DNA-ploidy, DNA-index and %S-phase cells have been proven to have prognostic value for breast cancer patients. These variables can be obtained by interpreting DNA-histograms by cell cycle analysis. Since there are a number of potential error sources, the aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis with the emphasis on DNA ploidy and %S-phase assessments. The 149 DNA-histograms we used were randomly selected from the Multicentre Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project, a nationwide prospective study in The Netherlands on the reproducibility and prognostic power of quantitative assessments. These DNA-histograms were obtained by flow cytometry of fresh frozen breast cancer material. Cell cycle analysis was performed according to a strict protocol with the semi-automated computer program 'MultiCycle', using the background correction option; 68 histograms were analyzed in duplicate by the same observer, and 81 histograms were analyzed by two observers. Assessment of DNA-ploidy showed an intra-observer concordance of 99% (kappa-value 0.98) and an inter-observer concordance of 94% (kappa-value 0.91). The disagreement could be attributed to overlooking a DNA-tetraploid cell cycle in one case, some difficult histograms and varying opinions about small peaks between the observers in a few cases. Intra-observer %S-phase correlation coefficients varied between 0.72 for the %S-phase of the second aneuploid cell cycle and 0.99 for the %S-phase of the diploid cell cycle. Inter-observer correlation coefficients varied between 0.81 for the %S-phase of the second cell cycle and 0.95 for the %S-phase of the diploid cell cycle and the average %S-phase cells. As for DNA-index, intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.94, respectively. In conclusion, intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms from fresh breast cancer material using the Multi-Cycle program, following a strict protocol, is in principle high. The results of this study may help us to decide which of the different %S-phases provided by cell cycle analysis software should be used in daily practice.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]