These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of relative survival vs. classical survival. Apropos of primary bronchial cancer].
    Author: Foucher P, Coudert B, Dramais-Marcel D, Arveux P, Camus P, Jeannin L.
    Journal: Bull Cancer; 1994 Oct; 81(10):857-65. PubMed ID: 7734768.
    Abstract:
    The aim of the study is to compare the usefulness of a recent relative survival model versus more classical methods for univariate and multivariate survival analysis, applied to a population of patients with surgically cured non small cell lung cancer, in determination of prognostic factors and appreciation of the exact role of age on survival. We studied 156 patients surgically treated between 1975 and 1988. Both univariate and multivariate analysis were performed, using the actuarial method and the Cox model for crude survival and the additive Hakulinen model (1985) for relative survival (total risk of death equal to natural risk of death in general population plus disease specific risk of death) which is an age-adjusted survival corrected for normal life expectancy. In addition, the loss in life expectancy was also calculated. Our 156 patients (including six females), whose age ranged from 30 to 78 (mean age 59) were almost all current or former smokers (97%) and 63% had clinical trouble. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histology (76%) before adenocarcinomas (20%). Pneumonectomy and lobectomy were equally performed. Post surgical TNM staging was stage I = 78 (50.3%), II = 23 (14.8%), IIIa = 44 (28.4%), IIIb = 10 (6.5%). By 31 December 1990, 116 patients had died, 24 were alive and 16 lost to follow-up. In univariate analysis, overall survival is (crude/relative): 1 year (75.8%/77.5%), 2 years (53.8%/56.0%), 5 years (28.7%/32.5%), 10 years (14.4%/18.9%). Univariate prognostic factors are histopathology, surgical procedure and post operative TNM staging. The overall loss in life expectancy is 71.4% (5.5 years of life expectancy vs 19.21). The loss is higher for the younger patients than for the older ones (73% for the 30-49 year old group--59.2% for the more than 70 year old group). In multivariate analysis, prognostic factors are: Cox model: post-surgical TNM staging, histopathology and age (RR = 2.18 [1.13-4.23] for patients over 65); Hakulinen model: TNM staging. In this model, age is no longer a significant prognostic factor. In conclusion, this study confirmed the poor prognosis of NSCLC, even if a curative surgical procedure has been possible, with a 5-year survival of 48% for stage I tumours but only 6% for stage III tumours. The most significant prognostic factor is the post-surgical TNM staging. The relative survival model of Hakulinen dismissed age as a significant prognostic factor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]