These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: An immunohistochemical and prognostic evaluation of cathepsin D expression in 105 bladder carcinomas. Author: Dickinson AJ, Fox SB, Newcomb PV, Persad RA, Sibley GN, Harris AL. Journal: J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):237-41. PubMed ID: 7776437. Abstract: Cathepsin D is a widely expressed aspartyl lysosomal protease. Clinical studies in several tumor types have shown a strong correlation between cathepsin D expression and tumor progression. In breast carcinoma, its expression is an independent prognostic factor associated with an increased risk of death. However, there have been no studies evaluating cathepsin D in bladder tumors. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the pattern of expression of cathepsin D in a large series of bladder carcinomas and assess its role as a prognostic factor against established variables. The tumors from 105 patients (median age 73) (median follow-up 26 months) with transitional cell carcinoma of bladder were examined. Forty-nine patients had superficial tumors (16 pTa; 33 pT1), 56 had invasive tumors (14 pT2; 42 pT3); there were 35 grade 1/2 tumors and 70 grade 3 tumors. These were stained by a standard immunohistochemical technique with an anti-cathepsin D monoclonal antibody. All 4 normal bladder specimens were positive for cathepsin D. Fifty-four tumors (51%) were positive for cathepsin D and 51 (49%) were negative. Chi square analysis showed a significant positive relationship between negative cathepsin D expression and stage (p < 0.0005), grade (p < 0.0001) and tumor morphology (p = 0.001). There was no relationship between cathepsin D expression and tumor ploidy (p > 0.1) or patient age (p = 0.09). Univariate analysis of disease-free and overall survival showed that negative cathepsin D expression (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0003 respectively), stage (p = 0.004 and p < 0.005 respectively) and grade (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0007 respectively) were associated with significantly worse prognosis. However, in a multivariate analysis of age, stage, grade and cathepsin D expression, only stage remained significant for overall survival (p < 0.005). The observed result for cathepsin D in the univariate analysis is probably due to its strong association with grade and stage. Nevertheless, cathepsin D status was able to provide additional prognostic information for overall survival in invasive tumors when stratifying for grade (p = 0.047), which suggests that it might provide additional prognostic data within particular tumor stages.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]