These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Atrial electrogram characteristics in patients with and without atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.
    Author: Niebauer MJ, Daoud E, Williamson B, Man KC, Strickberger A, Hummel J, Morady F.
    Journal: Circulation; 1995 Jul 01; 92(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 7788920.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Multicomponent atrial electrograms and "slow pathway potentials" are helpful in identifying target sites for radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. The purpose of this study was to compare the atrial electrograms recorded at various locations in the right atrium in patients with and without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia to assess the specificity of multicomponent atrial electrograms and possible slow pathway potentials both for the posteroseptal right atrium and for patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 25 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and 23 control patients without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia or dual AV nodal physiology, atrial electrograms with an AV ratio of < or = 1:2 were recorded at the posteroseptal right atrium near the coronary sinus ostium and in the right atrium near the posterior, lateral, and anterior aspects of the tricuspid annulus. Attempts were made to identify broad, multicomponent, and double atrial electrograms. There were no significant differences between the patients with and without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia in the mean number of deflections in the atrial electrograms or in the mean duration of the atrial electrograms recorded at any of the atrial sites. In all patients, the number of atrial electrogram deflections and the atrial electrogram duration were significantly greater at the posteroseptal position than at the other three atrial sites. The prevalence of potentials with the appearance of slow pathway potentials in the posterior septum was similar in patients with and without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (68% and 70%, respectively). The prevalence of these potentials was 6% to 25% at the other three atrial sites (P < .005 compared with the posterior septum). CONCLUSIONS: The atrial electrogram characteristics that have been found to be useful in identifying effective posteroseptal slow pathway ablation sites in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia are equally prevalent in patients without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia or dual AV nodal physiology. Atrial electrograms in the posteroseptal area are broader and contain more deflections than at other areas in the right atrium, possibly because of conduction properties of the posterior transitional zone that are independent of the presence of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]