These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Patient-ventilator interaction during synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. Effects of flow triggering.
    Author: Giuliani R, Mascia L, Recchia F, Caracciolo A, Fiore T, Ranieri VM.
    Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1995 Jan; 151(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 7812537.
    Abstract:
    Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) intermixes assisted and spontaneous breaths. Its ability as a weaning technique has been questioned on the basis that patients show little adaptation to ventilator assistance. We studied inspiratory effort and patient-ventilator interaction at different levels (SIMV, 100, 50, and 0%) of flow-triggered SIMV versus pressure-triggered SIMV in patients during the weaning period. The two triggering systems were evaluated during constant flow and constant pressure mandatory SIMV breaths. Inspiratory effort was estimated as the esophageal pressure time product (PTP) per breath (PTP/b) and per minute (PTP/min). The PTP/b and PTP/min of both mandatory and spontaneous breaths were significantly lower during flow triggering than during pressure triggering SIMV, irrespective of the ventilatory mode. During pressure-triggered SIMV PTP/b and PTP/min were identical for mandatory and spontaneous breaths, whereas during flow-triggered SIMV PTP/b and PTP/min were significantly lower for mandatory than for spontaneous breaths. This difference was greatest when flow triggering and constant pressure ventilation were associated. These data show that flow triggering reduces inspiratory effort during both mandatory and spontaneous SIMV breaths and obtains a better patient-ventilator interaction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]