These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of steroidal and non steroidal aromatase inhibitors on sexual behavior and aromatase-immunoreactive cells and fibers in the quail brain.
    Author: Foidart A, Harada N, Balthazart J.
    Journal: Brain Res; 1994 Sep 19; 657(1-2):105-23. PubMed ID: 7820608.
    Abstract:
    Castrated quail were treated with Silastic implants filled with testosterone (T) in association with injections of the aromatase inhibitors, R76713 (racemic vorozole; 1 mg/kg twice a day) or 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (OHA; 5 mg/bird twice a day). Control birds received no treatment (CX group) or were implanted with T capsules only (CX + T group). Both R76713 and OHA strongly inhibited the T-activated male copulatory behavior. This inhibition had the same magnitude in both groups. The growth of the cloacal gland, a strictly androgen-dependent process was not affected by these compounds. The treatments significantly affected the number of aromatase-immunoreactive (ARO-ir) cells in each of the six brain areas that were studied: the anterior and posterior parts of the sexually dimorphic medial preoptic nucleus (POM), the septal region, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) and the anterior and posterior parts of the tuber. This number was significantly increased in all areas by T. In agreement with our previous study, R76713 significantly inhibited this effect of T in the tuberal hypothalamus but not in the anterior POM nor in the BNST. By contrast the effect of T on the number of ARO-ir cells was completely blocked by OHA in all brain nuclei. The two inhibitors had statistically different effects in all brain regions. Like in a previous study, R76713 increased the intensity of the staining of all ARO-ir cells. This effect took several days to develop suggesting a progressive build-up of the enzyme concentration. This was also suggested by the fact that a rebound in aromatase activity was observed 16 to 24 h after a single injection of R76713. The increased immunoreactivity was not observed in OHA-treated birds. The denser immunoreactivity in R76713-treated birds and the better tissue preservation due to the aldehyde fixative that had been used provided here a clearer picture of the cellular and subcellular localization of ARO-ir material. This allowed to identify new groups of immunoreactive cells, namely in the nucleus accumbens, in the area of the paleostriatum ventrale, in the nucleus taeniae, in the medial and caudal hypothalamus and in the medial part of the mesencephalon and of the pons. Most of the immunoreactive material was located in perikarya but some of these cells were also surrounded by dense networks of ARO-ir fibers often associated with immunopositive punctate structures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]