These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Identification of E6/E7 transcription patterns in HPV 16-positive cervical cancers using the reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction.
    Author: Rose BR, Thompson CH, Tattersall MH, Elliott PM, Dalrymple C, Cossart YE.
    Journal: Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Feb; 56(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 7896192.
    Abstract:
    Studies indicate the presence of four different forms of human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA resulting from differences in transcription patterns and post-transcriptional nuclear splicing. Through a retrospective analysis of 28 cervical cancer patients, correlations were sought between E6/E7 transcription patterns and histologic type, FIGO stage, and tumor aggression. A combined reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction was used to study E6/E7 transcription patterns in fresh and/or fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of HPV 16-positive cervical cancers. Random cervical biopsies from nine women with no history of cervical disease were included as controls. Two sets of primers used in the investigations detected the full-length (FL) E6, E6*I, and E6*II mRNAs and the FL E6 and E6*I mRNAs, respectively; eight of the tumors were also analyzed using a third primer combination designed to identify the E6*III mRNA. At least two of the transcripts were detected in all of the tumors, whereas E6/E7 mRNAs were not identified in any of the control cervical biopsies. Overall, the transcription patterns were consistent, but the major E6*I mRNA was not detected in two of the tumors. No relationship was found between the E6/E7 transcription patterns and the histological type and differentiation of the tumors, nor with the FIGO stage and the clinical behavior of the disease. The study confirms that E6/E7 transcription is a constant feature of HPV 16-related carcinoma, but the findings indicate that there may be no clinical advantage in adding E6/E7 mRNA detection to the routine assessment of cervical tumors.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]