These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Improved treatment planning for the Syed-Neblett template using endorectal-coil magnetic resonance and intraoperative (laparotomy/laparoscopy) guidance: a new integrated technique for hysterectomized women with vaginal tumors. Author: Corn BW, Lanciano RM, Rosenblum N, Schnall M, King S, Epperson R. Journal: Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Feb; 56(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 7896194. Abstract: The Syed template (Alpha-Omega Services, Bellflower, CA) represents an advance in interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy; however, its appeal is diminished by inaccuracies in target definition secondary to suboptimal imaging of gynecologic tumors and the risk of viscus perforation during a "blind" procedure. Magnetic resonance (MR) scanning with an endorectal coil and computed tomography were studied as a possible tool to improve target definition and maximize treatment planning with Syed templates. Abdominopelvic contents could be visualized directly through a laparotomy incision or indirectly with a laparoscopic video display to allow further target definition and minimize complications associated with blind procedures after hysterectomy. The synthesis of these techniques with Syed template applications was attempted to potentiate the utility of this brachytherapy system. Five patients with apical vaginal tumors which arose after previous hysterectomies (two endometrial cancer recurrences, one recurrent uterine sarcoma, two primary vaginal cancers) were referred for radiotherapy. In three cases, external beam pelvic radiotherapy (median dose, 45 Gy; range, 45-50.4 Gy) was delivered initially. In all cases, the Syed applicator was used for the brachytherapy component of the treatment. In two cases, high-resolution MR images (400 x 400 microns) of the vaginal apex were obtained after insertion of an endorectal surface coil. The images defined the relationships between the template, target volume, bladder, rectum, and intestine. The other three cases were planned with computerized tomography (CT). In all cases, intraoperative examination of the abdominopelvic contents was provided when laparotomy and/or laparoscopy was performed by the surgical team. The median brachytherapy dose prescribed to the isodose envelope covering the target volume was 40 Gy (range, 31-50 Gy). In all cases, the target volumes could be encompassed by the 60 cGy/hr isodose line. Tumor volume estimation was better with MR than CT. Procedure time was shorter with laparoscopy than with laparotomy. In two cases, bowel displacement was performed (one tissue expander, one omental sling) to prevent viscus perforation by interstitial needles. Four of five patients responded completely to the treatment. In three cases, local control was maintained at a median follow-up of 11 months. In conclusion, endorectal coil MRI may be advantageous to CT of the pelvis in that it allows preplanning to be achieved with greater precision and with less planning time. Major intraoperative complications (i.e., perforation of hollow viscus organs) can be avoided when the course of interstitial catheters is visualized from above by the surgical team.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]