These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Middle fossa acoustic neuroma surgery--indications and predictive factors for hearing restoration].
    Author: Murakami S, Yanagihara N, Asai M, Gyo K, Nakamura K.
    Journal: Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1995 Jan; 98(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 7897578.
    Abstract:
    Between June 1990 and May 1993, 17 acoustic tumors were removed by the middle cranial fossa approach with attempted hearing preservation. Measurable hearing was restored in 13 patients (76.5%) and useful hearing (PTA < 50 dB, SDS > 50%) in 10 patients (58.8%). In addition, significant hearing improvement, greater than 10 dB in pure-tone average, was noted in 6 patients (35.3%). In the hearing improvement group, useful hearing was restored after tumor resection in two patients with poor preoperative hearing. These six patients with hearing improvement exhibited several findings in common: smaller tumors, sudden deterioration of hearing, trough type of audiogram, inferior vestubular nerve origin and short duration of hearing loss before surgery. Such signs suggested favorable preoperative prognostic factors for potential postoperative hearing improvement. Because there was no significant difference between postoperative facial nerve outcome in the middle cranial fossa approach and the translabyrinithine approach in our series of small tumors, we recommend the use of the middle cranial fossa approach for hearing preservation in patients with small tumors, even when their hearing is poor preoperatively.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]