These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [A comparison of positive and negative enteral contrast media for the magnetic resonance tomography of the abdomen].
    Author: Kaminsky S, Laniado M, Gogoll M, Clauss W, Langer M.
    Journal: Rofo; 1994 Sep; 161(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 7919247.
    Abstract:
    Following oral administration of a buffered gadopentetate-dimeglumine solution (Magnevist enteral, 1 mmol/l, 6-17 ml/kg) T1-, proton-density- and T2-weighted spin-echo images of abdominal and retroperitoneal lesions were acquired (0.5 T). Gadopentetate is a signal-enhancing, positive MR contrast agent, intraluminal air served as a model of a signal-free, negative agent. In 21 patients contrast/noise ratios of gadopentetate and air versus lesions and fat were compared quantitatively (t-test). In T1- and T2-weighted images contrast/noise ratios of gadopentetate versus lesions were significantly higher than those of air. In proton-density images there was no significant difference. In T1- and proton-density images contrast/noise ratios of air versus abdominal fat were significantly higher than those of gadopentetate, in T2-weighted images gadopentetate had a significantly higher contrast/noise ratio than air. Signal-enhancing positive contrast agents seem advantageous over signal-free negative enteral MR contrast agents.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]