These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Poor perinatal outcome associated with retained cerclage in patients with premature rupture of membranes. Author: Ludmir J, Bader T, Chen L, Lindenbaum C, Wong G. Journal: Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Nov; 84(5):823-6. PubMed ID: 7936520. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of immediate cerclage removal versus retention in patients experiencing premature rupture of the membranes remote from term (PROM). METHODS: Thirty patients with prophylactic cerclage experiencing PROM at 24-32 weeks were managed expectantly after either immediate removal in 20 (67%) or retention of the cerclage in ten (33%). Thirty-three patients without cerclage and with PROM at the same gestational age were used as controls. RESULTS: More patients with retained cerclage (nine of ten, 90%) had delivery delayed for at least 48 hours after PROM compared to patients with immediate cerclage removal (ten of 20, 50%) (P < .05). Perinatal mortality was significantly higher for those with retained cerclage (seven of ten, 70%) than with immediate removal (two of 20, 10%) or in the control group (six of 33, 18%) (P < .001). Sepsis was responsible for most of the poor outcomes in the retained-cerclage group (71%). CONCLUSIONS: Although retaining the cerclage prolonged the latency period between PROM and delivery, that benefit was more than offset by a greatly increased perinatal mortality rate. Our study supports immediate cerclage removal regardless of gestational age in cases of PROM.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]