These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: De novo cancer in cyclosporine-treated and non-cyclosporine-treated adult primary renal allograft recipients.
    Author: Gruber SA, Gillingham K, Sothern RB, Stephanian E, Matas AJ, Dunn DL.
    Journal: Clin Transplant; 1994 Aug; 8(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 7949545.
    Abstract:
    We compared the incidence of de novo tumors developing in 1165 primary adult renal allograft recipients treated with azathioprine (AZA)-prednisone (Pred)-antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) (CONV group) with that in 722 patients receiving cyclosporine (CSA) as part of double (CSA-Pred), triple (CSA-Pred-AZA), or quadruple-therapy (CSA-Pred-AZA-ALG) protocols. Mean +/- SD follow-up was 9.5 +/- 6.4 years for the CONV group and 6.2 +/- 2.7 years for the CSA group. Overall, 124 patients (10.6%) in the CONV group and 34 patients (4.7%) in the CSA group developed malignancies, with nonmelanoma skin cancers and lymphomas comprising 55% and 13% of cancers in the CONV group and 65% and 3% of cancers in the CSA group, respectively. There were no significant differences in overall cancer (p = 0.41) or skin cancer (p = 0.97) incidence between non-CSA-treated and CSA-treated patients by Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis; however, CONV-treated patients demonstrated a higher incidence of lymphoma (p = 0.05). The mean (+/- SD) time to overall and skin cancer occurrence was significantly shorter in the CSA group: 37 +/- 22 versus 90 +/- 52 months (p < 0.001) and 40 +/- 24 versus 92 +/- 52 months, respectively. When the Cox Proportional Hazard Model was utilized to assess the relative importance of age, diabetic status, donor source, sex, and immunosuppressive regimen in determining cancer development, age > or = 50 years and nondiabetic status were significant independent prognostic indicators, while immunosuppressive regimen was not. Graft and patient survival were significantly greater in CONV-treated patients developing cancer than in those who did not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]