These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Loudness growth in forward masking: relation to intensity discrimination.
    Author: Zeng FG.
    Journal: J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2127-32. PubMed ID: 7963026.
    Abstract:
    The growth of loudness of a tone burst following an intense forward masker was measured as a function of the tone level. The level of the forward-masked tone was adjusted to balance the loudness of a standard tone presented without a forward masker, using a 2AFC, double-staircase, tracking procedure. The forward masker was a 90-dB SPL, 100-ms, 1000-Hz pure tone. The standard tone and the masked tone were both 25-ms, 1000-Hz pure tones. The forward masker and the masked tone were always presented in the first interval. With a 100-ms delay between them, there was little or no threshold elevation for the masked tone. However, the masker caused the masked tone to sound louder than it would if it had not been masked, a phenomenon termed "loudness enhancement" [Irwin and Zwislocki, Percept. Psychophys. 10, 189-192 (1971); Galambos et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 1127-1130 (1972)]. In addition, the present results show a nonmonotonic enhancement function that the forward masker introduced a 10-16-dB enhancement effect for tones of 40-65 dB SPL and no significant effect for the 30 and 90 dB SPL tones. The loudness variability in forward masking was estimated from the upper and lower sequences tracking the 21% and the 79% louder response levels on the psychometric function, respectively. The variability demonstrated a similar nonmonotonic function. In forward masking loudness grows more steeply at low-medium sensation levels, and merges with normal growth at high levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]