These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pulmonary embolism: prediction of the usefulness of initial ventilation-perfusion scanning with chest radiographic findings.
    Author: Goldberg SN, Palmer EL, Scott JA, Fisher R.
    Journal: Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):801-5. PubMed ID: 7972828.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of ventilation-perfusion scanning when chest radiographic findings are abnormal to decide which patients should initially undergo angiography because of suspected pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 951 patients who underwent examination between April 1, 1992, and August 24, 1993, were reviewed, and the results of ventilation-perfusion scanning and chest radiography were correlated. RESULTS: Approximately 8% of patients with radiographic findings of no acute disease, pleural effusion, and linear atelectasis had high-probability ventilation-perfusion scans. Pulmonary edema and parenchymal consolidation categories had fewer high-probability studies (3% and 1%, respectively; P < .01). The chance of obtaining a nondiagnostic result was similar for the first three categories (12%) but was more likely for pleural effusion and parenchymal consolidation (36% and 82%, respectively; P < .01). CONCLUSION: The results of ventilation-perfusion scanning are not useful with focal radiographic consolidation. It may be appropriate to proceed directly to pulmonary angiography in many of these patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]