These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Bioequivalence of a generic slow-release theophylline tablet in children.
    Author: Kanthawatana S, Ahrens RC, McCubbin M, Bronsky E, Blake K, Hendeles L.
    Journal: J Pediatr; 1994 Dec; 125(6 Pt 1):987-91. PubMed ID: 7996375.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a generic slow-release theophylline tablet (manufactured by Sidmak Laboratories, Inc.) is therapeutically equivalent to a proprietary theophylline tablet, Theo-Dur, in children. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. SETTING: Multicenter clinics. PATIENTS: 38 children, 6 to 16 years of age, with asthma. INTERVENTIONS: Individualized doses of Theo-Dur or generic tablet every 12 hours for 5 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the last 24 hours of each regimen, theophylline serum concentrations were measured serially and a standardized exercise stress test was performed at 24 hours (trough serum concentration). Neither formulation effectively blocked the response to exercise; the maximum decrease in forced expiratory volume in the first second was 26.1% +/- 18.9% with Theo-Dur and 24.8% +/- 19.7% with the generic product (p = 0.68; beta = 0.08). The mean +/- SD peak serum concentrations were 18.0 +/- 3.0 micrograms/ml with Theo-Dur and 18.7 +/- 3.7 micrograms/ml with the generic tablet; the trough serum concentration was < 10 micrograms/ml in 15 subjects after administration of Theo-Dur and in 20 subjects after administration of the generic product. There were no significant differences in relative extent of absorption or the time to reach peak serum concentration. CONCLUSIONS: This generic formulation and Theo-Dur are bioequivalent in children. However, these results cannot be extrapolated to slow-release theophylline formulations that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as equivalent to Theo-Dur.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]