These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Hibernating myocardium versus scar: severity of irreversible decreased myocardial perfusion in prediction of tissue viability.
    Author: Go RT, MacIntyre WJ, Saha GB, Cook SA, Neumann DR, Chen EQ, Underwood DA, Kaczur T.
    Journal: Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 7997543.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To determine whether quantitation of the relative severity of decreased perfusion in irreversible defects on myocardial perfusion images enables differentiation of viable hibernating myocardium from scar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 145 patients with previous myocardial infarction, 1,252 regions with irreversible defects proved by means of rubidium-82 rest-stress imaging were analyzed for relative severity (percentage decrease in perfusion). Myocardial tissue viability was determined by means of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). RESULTS: The relative decreases in Rb-82 uptake in the 1,252 regions were categorized into nine levels of severity (30% to > or = 70%) in 381 regions of hibernating myocardium and 871 regions of scar. The values of relative decreased perfusion in the irreversible defects alone did not enable differentiation of hibernating myocardium and scar (P = .61). CONCLUSION: The results show no relationship between the relative severity of irreversible perfusion defects and the ability to distinguish between hibernating myocardium and scar.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]