These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: comparison of infusions of phenylephrine and ephedrine.
    Author: Hall PA, Bennett A, Wilkes MP, Lewis M.
    Journal: Br J Anaesth; 1994 Oct; 73(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 7999486.
    Abstract:
    Maternal cardiovascular changes and neonatal acid-base status were assessed in 29 healthy women undergoing elective lower segment Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. The patients were allocated randomly to one of three groups to receive an i.v. infusion of one of the following: ephedrine 1 mg min-1 (group E1: n = 10), ephedrine 2 mg min-1 (group E2: n = 9), or phenylephrine 10 micrograms min-1 (group P: n = 10). Invasive arterial pressure was monitored continuously and if hypotension occurred (defined as a 20% decrease from baseline, taken after i.v. preload administration), bolus doses of either ephedrine (6 mg in groups E1 and E2) or phenylephrine (20 micrograms in group P) were given. Only four patients became hypotensive in group E2, compared with eight patients in group E1 and nine patients in group P. The total time that the patients remained hypotensive was greatest in group P (P < 0.005), less in group E1 and least in group E2. Neonatal Apgar scores and acid-base profiles were similar in all three groups. In this study, an infusion of phenylephrine 10 micrograms min-1 with bolus doses of 20 micrograms was shown to be significantly less effective in maintaining systolic arterial pressure within 20% limits of baseline compared with an infusion of ephedrine 1 or 2 mg min-1 with bolus doses of 6 mg.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]