These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of intramuscular versus subcutaneous erythropoietin for the treatment of anemia in CAPD patients.
    Author: Abreo K, Lubom JA, Collier L, Fleming D, Work J.
    Journal: Adv Perit Dial; 1994; 10():124-8. PubMed ID: 7999809.
    Abstract:
    Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) can be administered to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients subcutaneously (SC), intravenously (IV), and intraperitoneally (IP). Subcutaneous rHuEpo is preferred in CAPD patients because of its ease of administration and favorable pharmacokinetics. The longer half-life of SC rHuEpo allows for one or two doses per week. Since SC rHuEpo can cause pain and local irritation at the injection site, the efficacy and safety of intramuscular (IM) rHuEpo were compared to SC rHuEpo in 6 random stable CAPD patients. The protocol in each subject consisted of a single weekly injection of IM rHuEpo for 3-6 months (period 1), crossover to SC rHuEpo for 3-6 months (period 2), and crossover to IM rHuEpo for 3-6 months (period 3). The rHuEpo dose was adjusted by protocol to achieve a target hematocrit of 30%-33%. Pain at the injection site was graded on a scale of 0-3. All patients preferred IM rHuEpo to SC rHuEpo because of less pain at the injection site. One patient tolerated IM rHuEpo for six months (period 1), then left the study after one month of SC rHuEpo because of ecchymoses and pain at the SC injection sites. In all patients, there was no significant difference in the dose of rHuEpo (U/kg/wk) during the three study periods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]