These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Pharmacodynamic equivalence and clinical trial of a new fluorocarbon-free glycerol trinitrate pump spray with low ethanol content in comparison to a fluorocarbon-containing reference spray and a fluorocarbon-free pump spray with high ethanol content].
    Author: Erb K, de Mey C, Zimmermann T, Mutschler H, Roll S, Belz GG.
    Journal: Arzneimittelforschung; 1994 Apr; 44(4):478-82. PubMed ID: 8011000.
    Abstract:
    The pharmacodynamic equivalence of a fluorohydrocarbons-(FCH)-free glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, CAS 55-63-0)-containing pump spray with low ethanol content (Nitrolingual-Spray N; TL) versus a conventional FCH-containing GTN spray (Nitrolingual-Spray, R) as reference and a FCH-free GTN pump spray with high ethanol content (TH) was investigated by digital plethysmography (DPG) in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled (TL-matched placebo spray), randomized, period-balanced, 4-way cross-over design. Additionally the clinical tolerability (as perceived by the subjects and reported to the treatments-administrating investigator) was determined. The DPG-changes (cla; ratio of c-incisure and systolic a-wave) after the sublingual (s.l.) administration of 0.8 mg GTN of TL were biostatistically equivalent with R: the confidence intervals (CI) of the point estimates of the maximal decrease in cla (TL/R: 0.98, 90%-CI: 0.84 to 1.14) and the area-weighted average decrease in cla (TL/R: 0.97, 90%-CI: 0.80-1.16) were well in a 80-125% tolerance range. The time of occurrence of the maximal DPG-effect of TL was not different from R (distribution-free estimate of the difference TL-R: -2.25 min, 95%-CI: -9.5 min to 2 min). In contrast the maximal DPG-effect of TH after the s.l. administration of 0.8 mg GTN had a statistically significant earlier onset (TH-R: -6 min, 95%-CI: -9.5 min to -2 min) and a higher area-weighted average response (TH/R: 1.12, 90%-CI: 0.95 to 1.34). TH consistently caused an utterly unpleasant burning sensation in the mouth, thus this perceived local discomfort was distinctly different compared to all other treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]