These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Class I and II HLA antigens in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in the south of Spain].
    Author: Camps García MT, Ocón Sánchez P, Alonso Ortiz A, Belmonte López MA, García Portales R, Frutos Sanz MA, Guil García M, de Ramón Garrido E.
    Journal: Med Clin (Barc); 1994 May 14; 102(18):688-93. PubMed ID: 8028418.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: To establish the relation between class I and II HLA antigens, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), autoantibodies production, and clinical manifestations in the south of Spain (Málaga). METHODS: In a regional hospital we undertook a case-control study with a consecutive sample of 104 patients with SLE who fulfilled at least 4 criteria of ARA. Three hundred and twenty-eight local controls with no apparent pathology were included for comparison. We evaluated clinical and analytical aspects about multisystem autoimmune disease. HLA typing was serologically determined. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed a relation between SLE and the specificities B8 (21% of patients vs 10% of controls, p = 0.005; RR = 2.3), DR3 (36% vs 20%, p = 0.0006; RR = 2.5), DRw52 (69% vs 49%, p = 0.001; RR = 2.3), and DQ2 (49% vs 36%, p = 0.0150; RR = 1.7). However, in logistic regression multivariate analysis, there was a confounding effect between DR3 and DRw52, and it could be that only this specificity, HLA-DRw52 (RR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.1-4.0), and of lesser degree B8 (RR = 1.9; 95% CI: 0.9-4.4), are really associated with SLE. Also, in multivariate analysis, DR6 showed a negative association (5% vs 25%, p = 0.011; RR = 4.2; 95% CI: 1.5-17.2) with anti-U1RNP, while DRw52 showed a negative association with IgG-aCL (50% vs 85%, p = 0.019; RR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.06-0.76). Furthermore, DQ2/DQ6 showed positive association with anti-SSA/Ro antibodies (50% vs 24%; p = 0.046; RR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.0-9.0). There were also several associations between clinical manifestations and HLA. The specificities DR and DRw53 were almost always risk factors, but only DR5 was a protector for renal lesion. DRw52 and DQ specificities were always protectors when they were associated with some clinical manifestations. Isolated DR3 antigen, is not associated with any of the above-mentioned manifestations. CONCLUSIONS: The previously described relation between SLE and the antigen DR3 is confirmed, but this association could be a result of the presence of DRw52 specificity in patients, that is in linkage disequilibrium with DR3.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]