These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of mepifylline in oral solution in children with mild and moderate asthmatic crises].
    Author: Sienra Monge JJ, Prieto Ursúa L, Gerardo Sol Monterrey E, Estela del Río Navarro B, Paredes Novelo MC.
    Journal: Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 1994; 22(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 8030582.
    Abstract:
    Efficacy and safety of mepiphylline, a derivative of theophylline, was evaluated in a group of children, aged 6 to 10 years, with mild or moderate acute asthma. A parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, prospective study was performed in 40 children. Twenty one of them received mepiphylline in dose of 8 mg/kg/día divided in 3 during 10 days, and 19 (control group) received placebo. Salbutamol aerosols were available in both groups. Clinical and spirometric data were collected before the beginning of the treatment (pre-and-post-nebulized salbutamol), and at the 3rd, 7th and 10th days. Children and parents cooperated with a diary of symptoms, peak-flow measurements and account of salbutamol used. A total relief of symptoms was found in 14 patients in the mepiphylline group and just 8 of the control group, with no significant differences. Neither spirometry nor diary data showed significant differences. Salbutamol was less than 3 days of unnecessary in 13 patients (61.9%) in the mepiphylline group and 8 patients (42.1%) in the control group (p < 0.05; Kolmogorov-Smirnov two samples Test). We conclude that mepiphylline could be a complementary treatment of mild and moderate acute asthma with a good safety in children.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]