These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: MR assessment of the normal position of the spinal cord in the spinal canal.
    Author: Holsheimer J, den Boer JA, Struijk JJ, Rozeboom AR.
    Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 May; 15(5):951-9. PubMed ID: 8059666.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To investigate intradural geometry, which strongly influences the effects of epidural spinal cord stimulation. METHODS: Axial MR images with turbo spin-echo were made of 26 healthy subjects at C-4 through C-6, T-5 and T-6, and T-11 and T-12, at T-11 and T-12 both in the supine and the prone position. Measurements were made of the dorsomedial and the ventromedial cerebrospinal fluid layer and the anteroposterior and transverse sizes of both the spinal cord and the dural sac. The samples of all variables were analyzed statistically. The distance between spinal and vertebral midline was also determined. RESULTS: The dorsal cerebrospinal fluid layer was 1.5 to 4.0 mm at C-4 through C-6 and 4.0 to 8.5 mm at T-5 and T-6. At T-11 it was 2.0 to 6.0 mm in the supine position and was increased by approximately 2.2 mm in the prone position. At T-12 these values were 1.5 to 4.5 mm and approximately 3.4 mm, respectively. Differences between the spinal and vertebral midline up to 1.5 to 2.0 mm occurred in approximately 40% of the images. CONCLUSIONS: Because there are variations of the dorsal cerebrospinal fluid layer among subjects by more than a factor of 2, and significant variations of the mediolateral position of the spinal cord, information on these parameters in patients will be essential for the optimal application of epidural spinal cord stimulation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]