These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical evaluation of an automated enzyme-linked fluorescent assay for the detection of chlamydial antigen in specimens from high-risk patients.
    Author: Steingrímsson O, Olafsson JH, Sigvaldadóttir E, Pálsdóttir R.
    Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Feb; 18(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 8062526.
    Abstract:
    A fully automated enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA) on the Vitek Immunodiagnostic Assay System (VIDAS CHL) was evaluated for the detection of chlamydial antigen in specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic high-risk patients. The results were compared with those from McCoy cell culture and Chlamydiazyme with a blocking assay. False-positive VIDAS specimens were centrifuged and the pellet stained with direct fluorescent antibody (DFA). Of the 158 urine specimens, 52 (33%) were infected by Chlamydia trachomatis. The sensitivity and specificity of the VIDAS when compared with cell culture, DFA, and Chlamydiazyme were 75% and 96%, respectively, for urine specimens while the predictive value of a positive (PVP) and a negative (PVN) were 91% and 88%, respectively. Of the 245 urethral swabs, 75 (31%) were considered positive. The sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 92%, respectively, and the PVP and PVN were 80% and 87%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity on the 108 cervical swabs, 22 of which were positive, were 95% and 95%, respectively, and PVP and PVN were 88% and 99%, respectively. Compared with Chlamydiazyme, the VIDAS was more sensitive on specimens from female patients and urine specimens, but less sensitive on urethral specimens from male patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]