These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In vitro activity of bisquinoline WR268,668 against African clones and isolates of Plasmodium falciparum.
    Author: Basco LK, Andersen SL, Milhous WK, Le Bras J, Vennerstrom JL.
    Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg; 1994 Feb; 50(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 8116813.
    Abstract:
    The in vitro activity of a new bisquinoline, WR268,668, was determined against chloroquine-susceptible and chloroquine-resistant African clones and isolates of Plasmodium falciparum using an isotopic semimicro drug susceptibility assay. The chloroquine-resistant clone (mean 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] = 61.2 nM) was 11 times less susceptible to WR268,668 than the chloroquine-susceptible clone (IC50 = 5.75 nM). A similar result was obtained with fresh clinical isolates, with the chloroquine-susceptible isolates (IC50 = 5.36 nM, n = 11) being significantly (P < 0.05) more susceptible to WR268,668 than the chloroquine-resistant isolates (IC50 = 16.1 nM, n = 18). The compound WR268,668 exhibited a high activity against some moderately chloroquine-resistant isolates. There was a significant positive correlation between the in vitro responses to chloroquine and WR268,668 (r = 0.904, P < 0.05). Combinations of WR268,668 and desipramine, a chloroquine efflux inhibitor, showed that resistance to WR268,668 can be reversed against the chloroquine-resistant clone and that desipramine has no effect on the activity of WR268,668 against the chloroquine-susceptible clone. The results of the study indicate the presence of cross-resistance between chloroquine and WR268,668, and suggest that the basis of resistance to WR268,668 may be similar to that of other 4-aminoquinolines.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]