These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [The functional and hemodynamic benefits of automatic atrioventricular interval delay in permanent atrial synchronized pacing].
    Author: Occhetta E, Rognoni G, Perucca A, Aina F, Magnani A, Francalacci G, Rossi P.
    Journal: G Ital Cardiol; 1993 Sep; 23(9):877-86. PubMed ID: 8119517.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: In order to assess possible functional and hemodynamic benefits of different programming of atrioventricular (AV) delay--156 ms fixed vs 156 to 63 adaptive--two maximal exercise tests (cyclette) were performed in 8 patients (6 males, 2 females; 69 +/- 6 years) implanted with Chorus 6003 (Ela Medical, France) DDD pacemakers for complete AV block with normal sinus node function. METHODS: The measured parameters were: pacing rate, cardiac output (thermodilution method), oxygen consumption (2001 gas-exchange analyser), arterial-venous difference (derived from pulmonary oxygen saturation, through an optical-fibers Swan-Ganz catheter coupled to an Oximetric3-Abbott oximeter), human atrial natriuretic factor and lactate plasmatic levels, anaerobic threshold. RESULTS: A better cardiac output (11.4 +/- 1.7 vs 10.1 +/- 1.8 l/min) and oxygen consumption (1521 +/- 425 vs 1408 +/- 465 ml/min) were observed at maximal exercise with adaptive rather than with fixed AV delay programming (p < 0.05); moreover anaerobic threshold point was reached later during exercise test with adaptive AV delay (242 +/- 92 vs 216 +/- 109 sec, p = 0.05). On the contrary, with adaptive and fixed AV delay, there were not statistically different values of maximal heart rate (139 +/- 9 vs 139 +/- 9), levels at maximal exercise of arterial-venous difference (12.5 +/- 2 vs 12.8 +/- 1.4 Vol%O2), human atrial natriuretic factor (63 +/- 17 vs 78 +/- 48 pg/ml), lactate (29 +/- 15 vs 29 +/- 18 mg/dl), and oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold point (772 +/- 164 vs 786 +/- 229 ml/min). CONCLUSIONS: In DDD pacing adaptive AV delay causes aerobic and hemodynamic benefits.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]