These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Neoplasms of the glomus caroticum: magnetic resonance angiography versus magnetic resonance]. Author: Carriero A, Tonni AG, D'Ettorre L, Iezzi A, Tartaro A, Bonomo L. Journal: Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):71-5. PubMed ID: 8128036. Abstract: This work was aimed at investigating the diagnostic role of Magnetic Resonance angiography (MRA) versus spin-echo images in the study of carotid paragangliomas. Ten patients affected with carotid paragangliomas were studied; surgery was the gold standard. MR examinations were performed with a superconductive 1.5 T magnet and a linear head coil. T1-weighted (TR 500 ms, TE 15 ms, 256 x 256 matrix) and T2-weighted (TR 2000 ms, TE 15/90 ms, 256 x 256 matrix) spin-echo sequences were acquired. TOF 3D (flash: FA 25 degrees, TR 30 ms, TE 7 ms) MRA images were acquired; coronal and sagittal images were rotated according to the MIP. Spin-echo images demonstrated the typical "salt and pepper" pattern in all cases. In 6 cases (lesion diameter > 3 cm) the vascular structures of the paragangliomas and carotid dislocation were clearly demonstrated by MRA. MRA also depicted carotid dislocation in all cases. In conclusion, in the evaluation of carotid paragangliomas > 3 cm diameter, MRA yields complementary information on vascular structures and dislocation of carotid vessels to spin-echo MR sequences.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]