These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Regulation of antibody specificity to Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 by adjuvant and MHC haplotype.
    Author: Chang SP, Nikaido CM, Hashimoto AC, Hashiro CQ, Yokota BT, Hui GS.
    Journal: J Immunol; 1994 Apr 01; 152(7):3483-90. PubMed ID: 8144929.
    Abstract:
    An effective malaria vaccine must be capable of eliciting a protective immune response in individuals of diverse genetic makeup. In this report, we describe the co-regulation of immune responsiveness to growth-inhibitory Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1) epitopes by MHC-linked immune response genes and by the adjuvant used in MSP-1 vaccine formulations. When congenic mice differing in MHC haplotype were immunized with MSP-1 either in CFA or incorporated into a synthetic monophosphoryl lipid A (LA-15-PH)-liposome formulation, mice of different haplotypes produced anti-MSP-1 Abs capable of inhibiting P. falciparum growth. Mice of H-2b and H-2ja haplotypes produced Abs possessing high levels of inhibitory activity upon immunization with MSP-1 in LA-15-PH/liposomes whereas these haplotypes produced noninhibitory Abs when immunized with MSP-1 in CFA. Conversely, H-2d haplotype mice produced inhibitory Abs when immunized with MSP-1 in CFA but not when immunized with MSP-1 in LA-15-PH/liposomes. The LA-15-PH/liposome adjuvant was more effective than CFA in inducing growth-inhibitory Abs. The level of parasite growth inhibition observed for a particular mouse strain correlated with Ab titers against conserved, C-terminal MSP-1 epitopes, which appear to be important targets for Ab-mediated inhibition in mice immunized with both adjuvant formulations. Our results suggest that adjuvant formulation and MHC genes act in a reciprocal manner to control immune responsiveness to specific epitopes, and raise the possibility of manipulating genetically-controlled responsiveness to vaccine Ags by utilizing alternative adjuvants in vaccine formulations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]